No, it uses the same app that the RPi version does... I just prefer to VNC into the system since I have dedicated computers set up for both use around the house and also for when I go off-site.Hi Tracy. So with Stellarmate X you VPN in only ? There's no app like for the Pi version ?
Yeah.. I may buy another M2 SATA to do the same. I am used to StellarMate and really like it... especially the fact that you can have the app to at least check regularly if you don't want to control the rig with it.I'm going to have to try this. I also have a Beelink U59...I'll keep Win '10 that's on it and just switch out the M.2 drive with another and install Stellarmate.
newbie
aspect of using it after being used to StellarMate.From some research, it appears that it works with Ubuntu at least... so StellarMate X should work fine on it also as it uses Kubuntu.MY U59 is the version just before yours with the N5095 processor. Maybe I wouldn't have issues with the wi-fi on that one.
I haven't gotten to play with it "live" yet. The benefit of the RPi 4 is the light weight of the unit if mounting directly on the telescope (which is what I do on my primary rig). Both NUCs that I have are about 1 pound each. The downfall of the RPi 4 (and equivalent) is that it is MUCH slower due to the processor. I will be using the Intel NUC for the first time tonight and I expect the plate solving to be much faster. The other benefit of the NUC is the NVMe/M2 SATA drives compared to an SD card or even EMMC storage.Hi Tracy, based on your experience do you think one would be better off with the NUC version of StellarMate compared to the Raspberry Pi version ?
Mainly that you have to be close to your focal point when you start the auto-focus. If you are a few hundred ticks off, it won't focus well.That looks good. What do you mean you're fighting the focusing? My M.2 drive and extra uSD cards arrived.